If this isn’t a television Movie-of-the-Week by this time next year I’ll be most surprised. It’s a story that’s just quirky enough for the pages of The National Enquirer, and yet I’m not sure we can ignore it completely. Or to put it differently, when life — or the blog Bene Diction Blogs On — hands you a story like this, don’t bury it in the Wednesday Link List.
But you’re going to have to some clicking to follow the thread of this for yourself.
So here’s where it starts. There’s a woman who has a son who is five years old and goes to a church preschool. They have a Halloween party and he decides to go as Daphne, a Scooby Doo character who is female. So she decides to go along with all this — he’s only five, remember — and rents the costume. The other mothers are not so supportive. The woman has a blog, and a gift with words, and a few days later, on November 2nd, expresses her feelings about all this online in a post titled — with tongue firmly planted in cheek ’cause he’s only five — My Son Is Gay.
The blog post goes viral. Actually, it goes capital “V” Viral. I know some of us have blogs and have a list of “Top Posts for 2010,” but we’re talkin’ — as of last night — 46,180 comments on a single item. That’s just comments. The page views were in the millions.
Then, ten days later on November 12th she returns to her blog to report that the response has been, for the most part, supportive.
And then there are you guys. I cannot begin to wrap my mind around this outpouring of support. It is incomprehensible to me at this point. Yes, there are some out there that think I’ve made a colossal mistake and should never have ‘let’ [him] be what he wants. I respectfully disagree. I am 100% certain I did the right thing.
Did I mention that her husband is a policeman?
Did I mention she was then booked to appear on The Today Show?
The story is really heating up, and as you might expect, by November 16th, she is now in a totally defensive mode. Martin Luther nailed 97 theses to a cathedral door, and the comparison is worthy as this mom nails 20 points of information to her blog.
Part of the reason she does this, as it turns out, is that there’s a lot of stuff taking place in the background of the larger story. Much of that has to do with how her church responded. But she holds back writing about that until months later, on February 3rd, where we then learn that as all this is going on:
- She’s been accused of lying
- She’s been accused of “promoting gayness”
- She’s asked to take down the original blog post
- She’s asked to consider closing her blog
- She’s told to apologize to the women she “slandered and libeled” (this even though she referred to them only as A, B and C)
- She is barred from receiving communion
- In all this, she is not asked how her son is doing
I’m sure there are certain aspects to this story which leave it unfinished. But I’m equally sure that as a family, their lives will never be exactly the same. It’s no wonder that BDBO (the first link at top) refers to this as “spiritual care in the form of bullying.” At the intersection of Parents Drive and School Boulevard (and Church Road) things have become so serious that we’ve lost the ability to lighten up now and then and remember that we’re dealing with kids.
And S., if you’re reading this; I suppose it was inevitable that a few people might want to knock you down for the choice you made all those weeks ago, but the people in your church should not have been among that number. We in the church so easily shoot our own wounded. For those in the church who tend to rush toward judgment, I apologize. A five-year-old should get to have the fun of being a five-year-old.
As for the movie rights, I’m thinking of something that’s a updated spin on the hypocrisy of “Harper Valley PTA.” The kind of script where the people demanding apologies end up apologizing.
(I decided not to borrow the child’s picture, even though I like to have a picture in each story if possible; you will need to link for this one. I just didn’t want to add to the sensationalism of a story that’s already been sensationalized.)