Thinking Out Loud

March 18, 2010

The Story Is Getting Lost – Guest Post

My wife and I have known Rick Webster for about five years now.   For many years he blogged at Today at the Mission, where you can still read archived posts.   More recently, he’s been pastoring at The Third Space, a kind of alternative church in downtown Peterborough, Ontario; but only this week did I learn there was a Third Space blog.   When I read this post, I knew I had to share it with you, and rather than include it in yesterday’s links, I got Rick’s permission to reprint the entire blog post.

by Rick Webster

It’s a problem that I’ve been seeing more and more of lately. It’s everywhere. I first encountered it when reading the book, How to Read the Bible for All Its Worth.   The authors divide the bible into the various genres of writing – historical, poetic, apocalyptic, prophetic and so on. Each genre has to be interpreted according to its own unique quality – we can’t read the psalms in the same way we read the book of Acts. Okay, fair enough. But I soon discovered that this way of reading the bible divorced the Psalms from Acts and the connections between the two were lost. If there’s a narrative arc to the bible – if what Paul says in Romans is connected to what Adam did in Eden, and it is, then dividing the book into genres serves to break that arc and, in so doing, the story God is telling is lost. Instead we get, as the authors suggest, a book of rules and regulations, a book that is to “be read, understood and obeyed.” (their phrase).

Dividing the bible into an Old and New Testament, or even chapters and verses might do exactly the same thing. But we also have this incredibly common – some would say essential – part of our church life called a ’sermon’. In a sermon the preacher studies a passage of scripture and then makes a speech, from which the rest of us download information.  In this process, however, we isolate a text and, as a result, draw conclusions that often simply aren’t supported by the larger context.

I used to read the story of the three servants and their talents as a call to evangelism – we must not hide our faith, we must enlarge the Master’s Kingdom. The parable of the 10 virgins was an eschatological admonition to be ready for the return of Jesus. The story of the servants who worked in the vineyard for a day getting paid the same as those who worked for an hour was about all of us sharing in our heavenly reward equally.

But in reading through Matthew this year I’ve come to recognize that these stories are connected to the sheep and the goats judgment of Matthew 25. When seen as a whole, and when connected to the sheep and goats Judgment it becomes immediately apparent that these stories are about economic justice. Why did the virgins not share their oil? Why couldn’t they share one or two lamps and make sure there was enough oil to last the night? Instead, they sent the others, selfishly, away. Why did the two wise, confident servants not help the frightened one with his investments? Why did they not pool their resources? Clearly, this is a case of the rich getting richer while the poor get poorer. And in the story of the vineyard workers it appears that in the Kingdom of God the community is larger than the self, that we understand economic justice as what benefits us while God desires to distribute prosperity equally throughout the community. When we start connecting to the sheep and goats judgment the Sermon on the Mount becomes a document new and alien to our world; the house on the rock and the house on the sand take on a whole new meaning as well.

Every devotional, every bible study, every commentary I’ve ever read does exactly the same thing – subdivides the bible and thus, necessarily, fails us. But here’s the thing: every sermon we’ve ever heard, and every sermon I’ve ever preached, has done exactly the same thing. The limitations of the form require it. And there’s an awful, terrible, frightening truth in that. We’ve been going at this all wrong and some of us have dedicated our entire lives to this pursuit.

We need a new way to teach the bible. A way that allows for a long, long time to be spent dwelling in the text. Years, decades. A way that allows for long discussions and digressions.  A way that places it within the hands of the community instead of a priestly caste of pastors and theologians so that the Holy Spirit may speak among us, and through us, without the filter that is one person at the front of the room. And my fear is that none of this can be done within the frame of church as we know it. In fact, this single belief – that the scripture must dwell within the community, and the community within the scripture – challenges everything we know and understand about the role of a pastor, the nature and organization of church, our way of being the body of Christ together. The fear this engenders is enormous. And this new way has not yet come to be in our evangelical tradition. It may never come to be. But I think somewhere, somehow, someone should at least try, someone should begin.


  1. well worth posting …. and printing off tonight to read in bed with a highlighter!!!

    Comment by Mark R — March 18, 2010 @ 7:40 am

  2. Ah, the blogosphere. Lovely and mad.

    Thanks, Paul.

    Comment by Rick Webster — March 18, 2010 @ 8:22 pm

  3. Interesting that our brother Rick chooses to indict “EVERY” commentary he has ever read, then go on to provide us his own commentary — which, it obvious, he views as THE correct interpretation of the passages in Matthew. Having sampled his interpretative abilities, I will stick with the authors of “How to Read the Bible for All its Worth,” who it is clear, Brother Rick misunderstands.

    I am puzzled that the well-read brother who operates this blog found this piece so compelling.

    Comment by Jon Rising — March 18, 2010 @ 9:09 pm

  4. What I think is most interesting is the way that God is directing me to further study of the OT in order to enrich my understaning of the NT. In fact I just made a commitment to lead my discipleship group in just that sort of adventure…so my thoughts as well as a book I happened to pick up and now this blog piece all point me to a new direction….always amazes me the way God puts sign posts in my pathway…thanks!

    Comment by Cynthia — March 18, 2010 @ 9:40 pm

  5. Long before there were blogs, there were internet BBS sites, and the proprietors of those were known as “moderators.”

    That’s how I feel reading Jon’s comment about Rick’s article, because I know Jon’s heart and I know Rick’s heart, and I feel somehow caught in the middle, needing to moderate.

    So what I really need to do here is to respond to Jon’s closing paragraph… Why did I like this article so much?

    Rick’s comment about the depth of scripture, about spending years in the text, resonates with something many of us have been feeling for sometime. The scriptures were regarded by the ancients as a “jewel” and everybody knows that when you tilt a large precious stone different ways, the refracted light brings all types of new illuminations. There is a multi-layered thing going on that doesn’t just leave us with a single, dominant interpretation.

    Not every “new way of looking at the text” is going to be fruitful — some will miss the mark completely — but all will challenge us one way or another even if we don’t agree. I’d rather travel down that path for at least a short distance than listen to ministers parroting Matthew Henry’s interpretation.

    The idea of discerning the gospel writers’ decision to place certain stories adjacent to each other to make a much larger point isn’t unique; Rick is just echoing what other writers are currently saying.

    I also believe that what Rick refers to as “the filter that is one [priestly caste] person in the front of the room” can be God-ordained and can be helpful; but can also be man-ordained and be hurtful.

    With all its jewel-like complexities, the scriptures are also simple enough that everyone should be to not only take away something for themselves, but to contribute something to a general discussion. Everyone gives, everyone receives.

    I believe that the statement, “In Christ there is neither slave nor free, rich nor poor, male nor female… [add ‘educated nor uneducated]” applies not only to the composition of the Body of Christ in general, but also to those who bring something to the table.

    You’re gonna hear some wild interpretations in a Bible study group with that demographic mix, but the scriptures are tough; they can take the heat.

    Comment by Paul Wilkinson — March 18, 2010 @ 11:24 pm

  6. Paul, if you (or, Rick) have been, or, are being, subjected to ministers parroting Matthew Henry, then you have all the empathy I can muster. (In fact, if that were the sole alternative to Rick’s hermeneutic, I would likely join forces with you guys).

    However, there is a better way — a much better way. I can only suggest as a beginning place, that Rick, at least, return to “How to Read the Bible for All its Worth” and work his way through it. I saddens me that he did not hear Fee and Stuart’s hearts (as you have heard mine and Rick’s). Fee, I know, would be shocked that something thinks he fails to appreciate the “arc” Rick speaks of. And that Rick thinks those two authors have reduced the Scriptures to a “book of rules and regulations” brings him very close to needing to apologize to them.

    Perhaps future sharing of Rick’s concepts could be done sans the critique of “How to …”, as it undermines Rick’s credibility. I, too, heard Rick’s heart and know he is sincerely seeking the Spirit’s guidance.

    Interestingly, I am in full agreement that the ‘mining’ of God’s truth(s)is a time-consuming, but-oh-so-enriching enterprise.

    But it remains that the interpretations Rick has arrived at in Matthew have more to do with eisegesis than exegesis.

    Comment by Jon Rising — March 19, 2010 @ 12:10 am

  7. replacing “someone” for “something” in paragraph 2 will go along way toward making that paragraph a little smoother :-)

    Comment by Jon Rising — March 19, 2010 @ 12:21 am

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Your Response (Value-Added Comments Only)

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

Blog at

%d bloggers like this: